Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
United States of America v. Microsoft Corporation, 253 F.3d 34 (D.C. Cir. 2001), was a landmark American antitrust law case at the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
2018 United States Supreme Court case Microsoft Corp. v. United States Supreme Court of the United States Argued February 27, 2018 Decided April 17, 2018 Full case name United States v. Microsoft Corp. Docket no. 17-2 Citations 584 U.S. ___ (more) 138 S.Ct. 1186 Case history Prior Microsoft Corp. v. United States, S.D.N.Y. reversed, warrant quashed, and civil contempt ruling vacated (2nd Cir ...
United States, 390 U.S. 200 (1968) (per curiam) Costello v. United States, 390 U.S. 201 (1968) (per curiam) Piccioli v. United States, 390 U.S. 202 (1968) (per curiam) Forgett v. United States, 390 U.S. 203 (1968) (per curiam) Ortega v. Michigan, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Stone v. United States, 390 U.S. 204 (1968) (per curiam) Anderson ...
0–9. 1999 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States; 2000 term per curiam opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States
The designation is stated at the beginning of the opinion. Single-line per curiam decisions are also issued without concurrence or dissent by a hung Supreme Court (a 4–4 decision), when the Court has a vacant seat. The notable exceptions to the usual characteristics for a per curiam decision are the cases of New York Times Co. v. United ...
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down sixteen per curiam opinions during its 2017 term, which began October 2, 2017, and concluded September 30, 2018. [1] Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All ...
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2001 term, which began October 1, 2001, and concluded October 6, 2002. [1] Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices. All justices on ...
Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's opinion are per curiam. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly. Justices frequently join multiple opinions in a single case; each vote is subdivided accordingly.