enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Red herring - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring

    The character's name is a loose Italian translation of "red herring" (aringa rosa; rosa actually meaning ' pink ', and very close to rossa, ' red '). [ 9 ] A red herring is found in the first Sherlock Holmes story, A Study in Scarlet , where the murderer writes at the crime scene the word Rache ('revenge' in German), leading the police—and ...

  3. Trivial objections - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivial_objections

    Trivial objections (also referred to as hair-splitting, nothing but objections, barrage of objections and banal objections) is an informal logical fallacy where irrelevant and sometimes frivolous objections are made to divert the attention away from the topic that is being discussed.

  4. Red herring fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Red_herring_fallacy&...

    Language links are at the top of the page. Search. Search

  5. I'm entitled to my opinion - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I'm_entitled_to_my_opinion

    The fallacy is sometimes presented as "let's agree to disagree". [3] Whether one has a particular entitlement or right is irrelevant to whether one's assertion is true or false. Where an objection to a belief is made, the assertion of the right to an opinion side-steps the usual steps of discourse of either asserting a justification of that ...

  6. Fallacy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fallacy

    Boudry coined the term fallacy fork. [27] For a given fallacy, one must either characterize it by means of a deductive argumentation scheme, which rarely applies (the first prong of the fork), or one must relax definitions and add nuance to take the actual intent and context of the argument into account (the other prong of the fork). [27]

  7. Whataboutism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism

    The communication intent is often to distract from the content of a topic (red herring). The goal may also be to question the justification for criticism and the legitimacy , integrity , and fairness of the critic, which can take on the character of discrediting the criticism, which may or may not be justified.

  8. Two wrongs don't make a right - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_wrongs_don't_make_a_right

    By invoking the fallacy, the contested issue of lying is ignored (cf. whataboutism). The tu quoque fallacy is a specific type of "two wrongs make a right". Accusing another of not practicing what they preach , while appropriate in some situations, [ a ] does not in itself invalidate an action or statement that is perceived as contradictory.

  9. Talk:Red herring - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Red_herring

    The paper is freely online here - it says nothing about red herring meaning a diversion. Am I missing something? -- Green C 14:41, 2 June 2023 (UTC) I too see no evidence of the "diversion" sense, as well as no claim that the Heege MS's use of "red herring" is the first in English. Deor 14:50, 2 June 2023 (UTC)