Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Since JAMS decided that this basic fee applies across the board to X’s 2,200 arbitration cases, that would amount to around $3.5 million, with other fees possibly to follow.
JAMS, formerly known as Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc. [1] is a United States–based for-profit organization of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) services, including mediation and arbitration. [2] [3] H. Warren Knight, a former California Superior Court judge, founded JAMS in 1979 in Santa Ana, California. [4]
According to the 2008 fee schedule, consumers claiming less than $75,000 were charged filing fees of $19 (for a claim of $1,500 or less) to $242 (for claims valued from $55,000 to $74,999), plus a $20 fee for each objection, a $100 fee to submit a post-hearing memorandum or a request for an explained decision, and up to $250 for a participatory ...
In July 2009, the AAA stopped accepting consumer debt collection cases, after the National Arbitration Forum was forced to do so after questions arose about the fairness of its process. [ 3 ] In April 2013, the New York State Department of Financial Services hired the AAA to host mediation sessions between insurance companies and Hurricane ...
Court fees never available in a criminal case, even in cases of a bad faith argument [9] Arkansas Court costs assessed on conviction or guilty plea; [ 10 ] $150 for misdemeanor or felony violation and $75 for local ordinance [ 10 ]
An arbitral tribunal or arbitration tribunal, ... the arbitrator's fees, and (ii) any liability of the arbitrator (such as wasted costs), if the arbitrator should ...
Arbitration, in the context of the law of the United States, is a form of alternative dispute resolution.Specifically, arbitration is an alternative to litigation through which the parties to a dispute agree to submit their respective evidence and legal arguments to a third party (i.e., the arbitrator) for resolution.
Secondly it held that the arbitration agreement was unenforceable because it was silent with respect to the payment of filing fees, arbitrators' costs and other arbitration-related expenses. Because the agreement would therefore force Randolph to pay the "steep" arbitration costs, [3] and thus was unfair and invalid. It was this point on which ...