Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Supreme Court of California tort case law (2 P) Pages in category "Supreme Court of California case law" The following 52 pages are in this category, out of 52 total.
Case Docket no. Question(s) presented Certiorari granted Oral argument A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools: 24-249: Whether the ADA and Rehabilitation Act require children with disabilities to satisfy a uniquely stringent "bad faith or gross misjudgment" standard when seeking relief for discrimination relating to their education. January 17, 2025
Today flexible plastics such as PVC are often used. Galoshes are overshoes, and not to be confused with the form of large slip-on rubber boots (known in the United Kingdom as Wellington boots). A protective layer (made variously of leather, rubber, or synthetic ripstop material) that only wraps around a shoe's upper is known as a spat or gaiter.
California Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Activision Blizzard; City of Anaheim v. Angels Baseball LP; Corry v. Stanford University; County of Santa Clara v. California First Amendment Coalition; Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of the Boy Scouts of America
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 582 U.S. ___ (2017), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that California courts lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant on claims brought by plaintiffs who are not California residents and did not suffer their alleged injury in California. [1]
Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court, 1 Cal. 4th 617 (1992), was a Supreme Court of California case in which the court’s decision held that restaurants, grocery stores, and other food service establishments in California can be held liable for injuries sustained by patrons from foreign objects—including natural food parts—that are left in food.
The U.S. Supreme Court tackled a case on Tuesday involving a New York state man who was fired from his job as a commercial truck driver for failing a drug test after taking cannabidiol, or CBD ...
Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. 270 (2007), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that the sentencing standard set forward in Apprendi v. New Jersey (2000) applies to California's determinate sentencing law.