Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The House of Lords held that the Law of Property Act 1925, section 53(1)(c), was not applicable to situations where a beneficiary directs his trustees, by way of his Saunders v Vautier right to do so, to transfer full legal and equitable [6] ownership to someone else. The case is a proposition that an oral declaration to a bare trustee to ...
Section 53 reads: Appropriation and Tax Bills 53 Bills for appropriating any Part of the Public Revenue, or for imposing any Tax or Impost, shall originate in the House of Commons. [7] Section 53 is found in Part IV of the Constitution Act, 1867, dealing with federal legislative power. It has not been amended since the Act was enacted in 1867.
For disposing of existing equitable interests, the Law of Property Act 1925 provides in Section 53(1)(c) that: (c) A disposition of an equitable interest or trust subsisting at the time of the disposition, must be in writing signed by the person disposing of the same, or his agent thereunto lawfully authorised in writing or by will. [26]
An Act to amend the Law of Property Act, 1922, and the enactments thereby affected, and to facilitate the consolidation of the law relating to conveyancing and property, settled land, trustees, the registration of pending actions, annuities, writs, orders, deeds of arrangement and land charges, the administration of estates, the registration of ...
An Act to confirm and give effect to a certain Agreement amending and supplementing the Articles of Agreement for a Treaty between Great Britain and Ireland to which the force of law was given by the Irish Free State (Agreement) Act, 1922, and by the Constitution of the Irish Free State (Saorstat Eireann) Act, 1922.
The Constitution Act, 1867, is part of the Constitution of Canada and thus part of the supreme law of Canada. [1] [2] It was the product of extensive negotiations by the governments of the British North American provinces in the 1860s. [3] [4] Following those conferences, there were consultations with the British government in 1867.
Article II, Section 3, Clause 1 of the United States Constitution states that the president "shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient."
Section 15(1) prevents "discriminatory distinctions", while Section 15(2) permits governments to implement programs aimed at assisting disadvantaged groups (e.g., affirmative action) without the risk of challenge under Section 15(1). [12] [8] [c 26] The court also acknowledged certain limitations to the application of Section 15(2).