enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. International Shoe Co. v. Washington - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Shoe_Co._v...

    Jackson took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a party, particularly a corporation, may be subject to the jurisdiction of a state court if it has "minimum contacts" with ...

  3. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Mosk. Dissent. Clark, joined by McComb. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.

  4. Case citation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Case_citation

    United States Reports, the official reporter of the Supreme Court of the United States. Case citation is a system used by legal professionals to identify past court case decisions, either in series of books called reporters or law reports, or in a neutral style that identifies a decision regardless of where it is reported.

  5. Garrity v. New Jersey - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garrity_v._New_Jersey

    Case history; Prior: State v. Naglee, 44 N.J. 209, 207 A.2d 689 (1965); State v. Holroyd, 44 N.J. 259, 208 A.2d 146 (1965).: Holding; Where police officers being investigated were given choice either to incriminate themselves or to forfeit their jobs under New Jersey statute on ground of self-incrimination, and officers chose to make confessions, confessions were not voluntary but were coerced ...

  6. Pierson v. Post - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierson_v._Post

    Pierson v. Post is an early American legal case from the State of New York that later became a foundational case in the field of property law. The case involved an incident that took place in 1802 at an uninhabited beach near Southampton, New York. Lodowick Post, a local resident, was out with a hunting party when his hunting dogs caught the ...

  7. Collateral estoppel - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collateral_estoppel

    Collateral estoppel (CE), known in modern terminology as issue preclusion, is a common law estoppel doctrine that prevents a person from relitigating an issue. One summary is that, "once a court has decided an issue of fact or law necessary to its judgment, that decision ... preclude[s] relitigation of the issue in a suit on a different cause of action involving a party to the first case". [1]

  8. Brown v. Board of Education - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Board_of_Education

    Kentucky (1908) Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), [1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court ruling that U.S. state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality. The decision partially overruled the Court's 1896 ...

  9. Stambovsky v. Ackley - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stambovsky_v._Ackley

    Stambovsky v. Ackley, 169 A.D.2d 254 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991), commonly known as the Ghostbusters ruling, was a case in the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division.The court held that a house, which the owner had previously advertised as haunted by ghosts, was legally haunted for the purpose of an action for rescission brought by a subsequent purchaser of the house.