enow.com Web Search

  1. Ads

    related to: peer editing checklist research paper

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Help:Wikipedia editing for researchers, scholars, and academics

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Wikipedia_editing_for...

    If you have a choice between citing something to a textbook and to the original research paper it was published in, cite both: the research paper is an important part of the history of the subject, but the textbook will be better at convincing other editors that the subject is important, better at making the subject verifiable, and probably ...

  3. Wikipedia:Reliable sources checklist - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources...

    This is a rough indicator of post-publication peer review and acceptance. (Pro tips: if there is a DOI link, this will often show "where cited" for scientific publications. If it's a book, searching at Google Books (enclose the book title in quotes) can bring up cites.) WP:NJournals describes some other citation-finding tools and methods.)

  4. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...

  5. Scholarly peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scholarly_peer_review

    When peer review fails and a paper is published with fraudulent or otherwise irreproducible data, the paper may be retracted. A 1998 experiment on peer review with a fictitious manuscript found that peer reviewers failed to detect some manuscript errors and the majority of reviewers may not notice that the conclusions of the paper are ...

  6. Wikipedia:Peer review/Guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review/...

    Wikipedia's peer review is a way to receive ideas on how to improve articles that are already decent. It may be used for potential good article nominations , potential featured article candidates , or an article of any " grade " (but if the article isn't well-developed, please read here before asking for a peer review).

  7. Authorea - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorea

    When used as an editing tool for scientific papers, Authorea will automatically format a paper in the preferred style and provide files suitable for online submission to peer-reviewed journals and conferences. Over 40 publisher- and journal-specific styles are currently supported. [3]

  8. ICMJE recommendations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICMJE_recommendations

    The ICMJE recommendations (full title, "Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals") are a set of guidelines produced by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors for standardising the ethics, preparation and formatting of manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals for publication. [1]

  9. Wikipedia:Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review

    Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor. The process helps users find ways for improvement that they themselves didn't pick up on.

  1. Ads

    related to: peer editing checklist research paper