Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A self-published source can be independent, authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, and expert-approved. Self-published sources can be reliable, and they can be used (but not for third-party claims about living people). Sometimes, a self-published source is even the best possible source or among the best sources. For example:
Identifying and using primary sources requires careful thought and some extra knowledge on the part of Wikipedia's editors. In determining the type of source, there are three separate, basic characteristics to identify: Is this source self-published or not? (If so, then see Wikipedia:Identifying and using self-published sources.)
That is why self-published material such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs (as distinguished from newsblogs, above), content farms, podcasts, Internet forum postings, and social media postings are largely not acceptable as sources. Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when ...
Material available from sources that are self-published, primary sources, or biased because of a conflict of interest can play a role in writing an article, but it must be possible to source the information that establishes the subject's real-world notability to independent, third-party sources. Reliance on independent sources ensures that an ...
See WP:V#Self-published_sources_.28online_and_paper.29 for Professional Researchers and Journalists. Establishing relevance to the article in question is necessary for citation. The individual should meet one of the following criteria: The individual is the subject of the article;
And even though a self-published source might be acceptable, a non-self-published source is usually preferred, if available. Examples of acceptable sourcing of self-published works: I think that this page should state that, very broadly speaking, non-self-published sources are usually preferred for most purposes.
Reliable sources allow editors to verify that claims in an article are accurate. The higher the quality of the source for the statement it backs up, the more likely that statement is to be accurate. Independent sources help editors to write neutrally and to prove that the subject has received note. Wherever possible, editors should aim to use ...
Other reliable sources include university textbooks, books published by respected publishing houses, magazines, journals, and news coverage (not opinions) from mainstream newspapers. Self-published media, where the author and publisher are the same, are usually not acceptable as sources. These can include newsletters, personal websites, press ...