Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The "limited additional treatment" includes the comfort measures in addition to basic medical treatment. [21] “Full treatment” authorizes the medical team to try their best to save the individual and increases their life expectancy with all methods. [21] This option also allows people to choose whether they would like a trial period.
The MOLST Program is a New York State initiative that facilitates end-of-life medical decision-making. One goal of the MOLST Program is to ensure that decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment are made in accordance with the patient's wishes, or, if the patient's wishes are not reasonably known and cannot with reasonable diligence be ascertained, in accordance with the ...
In 2005, a six-month-old infant, Sun Hudson, with a uniformly fatal disease thanatophoric dysplasia, was the first patient in which "a United States court has allowed life-sustaining treatment to be withdrawn from a pediatric patient over the objections of the child's parent". [14]
Medical issues bring about plenty of tough decisions about what treatments you do and don't want performed. Because you may be incapacitated in these situations, many people prepare ahead of time ...
Removal of life-sustaining treatment is a step toward euthanasia. Euthanasia and sustaining from treatment are completely different aspects of death. Euthanasia is usually taking an active approach to the death of a patient while removing treatment simply allows the patient to die from their illness while providing them comfort care.
An advance healthcare directive, also known as living will, personal directive, advance directive, medical directive or advance decision, is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity.
The 1986 proposal to recognize brain death was opposed by organizations that viewed it as an intellectually dishonest means to end life-sustaining treatment for comatose patients in violation of their civil and religious rights.
A 2010 survey of more than 10,000 physicians in the United States found respondents divided on the issue of recommending or giving "life-sustaining therapy when [they] judged that it was futile", with 23.6% saying they would do so, 37% saying they would not, and 39.4% selecting "It depends". [3]