enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Schaffer method - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schaffer_method

   The Jane Schaffer method is a formula for essay writing that is taught in some U.S. middle schools and high schools.Developed by a San Diego teacher named Jane Schaffer, who started offering training and a 45-day curriculum in 1995, it is intended to help students who struggle with structuring essays by providing a framework.

3. Essay - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essay

   Almost all modern essays are written in prose, but works in verse have been dubbed essays (e.g., Alexander Pope's An Essay on Criticism and An Essay on Man). While brevity usually defines an essay, voluminous works like John Locke 's An Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Thomas Malthus 's An Essay on the Principle of Population are ...

4. BLUF (communication) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLUF_(communication)

   This conciseness in communication comes from placing at the start the conclusion the summarized vital information and actions. In journalistic writing, BLUF resembles the inverted pyramid structure for the latter also aims to serve the readers well by arranging the story elements in descending order of importance. Like the inverted pyramid ...

5. AOL Mail

   mail.aol.com

   Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

6. Five-paragraph essay - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five-paragraph_essay

   The five-paragraph essay is a format of essay having five paragraphs: one introductory paragraph, three body paragraphs with support and development, and one concluding paragraph. Because of this structure, it is also known as a hamburger essay , one three one , or a three-tier essay .

7. Logical consequence - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

   Consider the modal account in terms of the argument given as an example above: All frogs are green. Kermit is a frog. Therefore, Kermit is green. The conclusion is a logical consequence of the premises because we can not imagine a possible world where (a) all frogs are green; (b) Kermit is a frog; and (c) Kermit is not green.