enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. DO-178C - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178C

    The flexible nature of DO-178C's processes and entry/exit criteria make it difficult to implement the first time, because these aspects are abstract and there is no "base set" of activities from which to work. The intention of DO-178C was not to be prescriptive. There are many possible and acceptable ways for a real project to define these aspects.

  3. Software safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_safety

    Various standards suggest different levels, e.g. Software Levels A-E in DO-178C, [4] SIL (Safety Integrity Level) 1-4 in IEC 61508, [1] ASIL (Automotive Safety Integrity Level) A-D in ISO 26262. [2] The assignment is typically done in the context of an overarching system, where the worst case consequences of software failures are investigated.

  4. Automotive Safety Integrity Level - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automotive_Safety...

    DO-178C and DO-254 define the design assurance objectives that must be accomplished for given DAL. Unlike SIL, it is the case that both ASIL and DAL are statements measuring degree of hazard. DAL E is the ARP4754 equivalent of QM; in both classifications hazards are negligible and safety management is not required.

  5. Modified condition/decision coverage - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_condition/...

    For example, assignment of the number of days in a month (excluding leap years) could be achieved by using either a switch statement or by using a table with an enumeration value as an index. The number of tests required based on the source code could be considerably different depending upon the coverage required, although semantically we would ...

  6. Certification Authorities Software Team - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Certification_Authorities...

    The Certification Authorities Software Team (CAST) is an international group of aviation certification and regulatory authority representatives. The organization of has been a means of coordination among representatives from certification authorities in North and South America, Europe, and Asia, in particular, the FAA and EASA.

  7. Functional safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_Safety

    The US FAA have similar functional safety certification processes, in the form of ARP4761, US RTCA DO-178C for software and DO-254 for complex electronic hardware, [7] [8] which is applied throughout the aerospace industry. Functional safety and design assurance on civil/commercial transport aircraft is documented in SAE ARP4754A as functional ...

  8. What’s next for Infowars - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/next-infowars-100042853.html

    The company is being sold off as part of a defamation settlement after Jones falsely called the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre a hoax. At issue, Judge Christopher Lopez said Tuesday night ...

  9. DO-254 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-254

    The DO-254/ED-80 standard is the counterpart to the well-established software standard RTCA DO-178C/EUROCAE ED-12C. With DO-254/ED-80, the certification authorities have indicated that avionics equipment contains both hardware and software, and each is critical to safe operation of aircraft .