enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. United States v. Philip Morris - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Philip_Morris

    United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. [1] was a case in which the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held several major tobacco companies liable for violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization (RICO) Act [2] by engaging in numerous acts of fraud to further a conspiracy to deceive the American public about nicotine addiction and the health effects ...

  3. Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racketeer_Influenced_and...

    In 2000, Federal District judge William Rea ruled the RICO statute could be used to name the entire LAPD as a criminal enterprise for individuals suing it over police brutality and misconduct. [36] Over 140 civil RICO lawsuits were filed against the department. [37]

  4. Scheidler v. National Organization for Women (2006) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheidler_v._National...

    Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, 547 U.S. 9 (2006), was a lengthy and high-profile U.S. legal case interpreting and applying the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO): a law originally drafted to combat the mafia and organized crime, the Hobbs Act: an anti-extortion law prohibiting interference with commerce by violence or threat of violence, [1] and ...

  5. What is RICO, the law at the heart of Trump’s Georgia ...

    www.aol.com/rico-law-heart-trump-georgia...

    The state law – which is commonly referred to as RICO – is similar to the federal version of the statute that targets so-called criminal enterprises. Georgia’s law allows prosecutors to pull ...

  6. Georgia election racketeering prosecution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_election...

    Two of the charges were for filing the false electoral documents with the federal U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, and the other was for a filing in the case Trump v. Kemp in the same court. McAfee ruled that because the documents were filed in a federal court, they could not be prosecuted under state laws. [70]

  7. VoIP-Pal Announces Filing of Amended Complaint in Antitrust ...

    lite.aol.com/tech/story/0022/20241219/9322164.htm

    VoIP-Pal CEO Emil Malak reassured shareholders that the strategic focus on antitrust and RICO claims is the most efficient path to address the harm caused by the defendants. “While patent litigation remains ongoing in Waco, Texas, we believe this approach offers the quickest and most effective route to justice,” Malak stated.

  8. Sunny Hostin's husband drama discussed internally at 'The ...

    www.aol.com/news/sunny-hostins-husband-drama...

    The lawsuit was filed under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, in the Eastern District of New York—a strategy that legal experts say is designed to have a ...

  9. Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_prosecution_of...

    Federal prosecutions of public corruption under the Hobbs Act (enacted 1934), the mail and wire fraud statutes (enacted 1872), including the honest services fraud provision, the Travel Act (enacted 1961), and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (enacted 1970) began in the 1970s. "Although none of these statutes was ...