enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Custodial interrogation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Custodial_interrogation

    Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 444 (1966), [1] "custodial interrogation [refers to] questioning initiated by law enforcement officers after a person has been taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom of action in any significant way." The United States Supreme Court has clarified that a person is being subjected to a custodial ...

  3. Edwards v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edwards_v._Arizona

    Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981), is a decision by the United States Supreme Court holding that once a defendant invokes his Fifth Amendment right to counsel, police must cease custodial interrogation. Re-interrogation is only permissible once defendant's counsel has been made available to him, or he himself initiates further ...

  4. Howes v. Fields - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howes_v._Fields

    Howes v. Fields, 565 U.S. 499 (2012), [1] was a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that an interrogation of a prisoner was not a custodial interrogation per se, and certainly it was not "clearly established federal law" that it was custodial, as would be required by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA).

  5. Miranda warning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning

    In the United States, the Miranda warning is a type of notification customarily given by police to criminal suspects in police custody (or in a custodial interrogation) advising them of their right to silence and, in effect, protection from self-incrimination; that is, their right to refuse to answer questions or provide information to law enforcement or other officials.

  6. Oregon v. Bradshaw - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oregon_v._Bradshaw

    To decide this case, the Court had to determine whether the Oregon Court of Appeals had correctly applied Edwards v.Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 (1981). In Edwards, the Court had held that "an accused, having expressed his desire to deal with the police only through counsel, is not subject to further interrogation by the authorities until counsel has been made available to him, unless the accused ...

  7. Escobedo v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escobedo_v._Illinois

    As Escobedo was questioned during a custodial interrogation, the result for him would have been the same. [7] [8] [9] In the years following the decision, Escobedo received 12 felony convictions, including federal charges of selling drugs. He was also convicted of taking indecent liberties with children.

  8. 29-Year-Old in ‘Catatonic State’ After Rare Disorder Causes ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/29-old-catatonic-state...

    A 29-year-old man’s debilitating night terrors were the first sign of rare autoimmune disorder that rapidly progressed, landing him in the intensive care unit in a “catatonic state.” Ben ...

  9. New York v. Belton - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Belton

    New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that when a police officer has made a lawful custodial arrest of the occupant of an automobile, the officer may, as a contemporaneous incident of that arrest, search the passenger compartment of that automobile.