enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Timbs v. Indiana - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timbs_v._Indiana

    Timbs v. Indiana, 586 U.S. 146 (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court considered whether the excessive fines clause of the Constitution's Eighth Amendment applies to state and local governments.

  3. Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eighth_Amendment_to_the...

    The Supreme Court has held that the Excessive Fines Clause prohibits fines that are "so grossly excessive as to amount to a deprivation of property without due process of law". The Court struck down a fine as excessive for the first time in United States v. Bajakajian (1998). Under the Excessive Bail Clause, the Supreme Court has held that the ...

  4. How 'cruel and unusual punishment' and 'excessive fines ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/cruel-unusual-punishment-excessive...

    Under the “Excessive Bail Clause,” bail should not be higher than that which is necessary to make sure the defendant appears at trial. Timbs v. Indiana applied Excessive Fines Clause to the states

  5. Excessive Fines Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/?title=Excessive_Fines_Clause&...

    To a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section: This is a redirect from a topic that does not have its own page to a section

  6. Civil forfeiture in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the...

    Civil forfeitures are subject to the "excessive fines" clause of the U.S. Constitution's 8th amendment, both at a federal level and, as determined by the 2019 Supreme Court case, Timbs v. Indiana, at the state and local level. [5] A 2020 study found that the median cash forfeiture in 21 states which track such data was $1,300. [6]

  7. United States v. Bajakajian - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Bajakajian

    United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321 (1998), is a U.S. Supreme Court case holding that asset forfeiture is unconstitutional when it is "grossly disproportional to the gravity of the defendant’s offense", citing the Excessive Fines clause of the Eighth Amendment. [1]

  8. Category:Excessive Fines Clause case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Excessive_Fines...

    This page was last edited on 27 November 2011, at 03:27 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.

  9. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cooper_Industries,_Inc._v...

    While Furman confirmed the earlier incorporation of the 8th Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishment clause in Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 667 (1962) Cooper Industries v. Leatherman Tool Group incorporated the Excessive Fines clause. The Court later seemed to back away from this holding.