enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.

  3. Duty to warn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_warn

    Duty to warn is embedded in the historical context of two rulings (1974 and 1976) of the California Supreme Court in the case of Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California. [15] [page needed] [16] The court held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient ...

  4. Duty to protect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_protect

    The duty to protect was established by Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, [4] [page needed] which has been widely adopted by other states. [5] This case determined that the clinician has the duty to warn an identifiable victim.

  5. ‘Duty to warn’ guided US advance warning of the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/duty-warn-guided-us-advance...

    In 2015, then national intelligence director James Clapper formalized duty to warn in an official directive: The U.S. intelligence community bore “a responsibility to warn U.S. and non-U.S ...

  6. Ewing v. Goldstein - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ewing_v._Goldstein

    Ewing v. Goldstein 15 Cal. Rptr. 3d 864 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) is a landmark court case that extended California mental health professional's duty to protect identifiable victims of potentially violent persons, as established by Tarasoff v.

  7. Can Bystanders Make Failure-to-Warn Claims in Toxic Tort Cases?

    www.aol.com/news/bystanders-failure-warn-claims...

    A failure-to-warn claim is a staple of products liability litigation. The basic premise is that a manufacturer or seller failed to warn a consumer about an unreasonable risk of foreseeable harm ...

  8. Justices to Determine Scope of Mental Health Professionals ...

    www.aol.com/news/justices-determine-scope-mental...

    The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has agreed to hear arguments over whether mental health professionals have a duty to warn of threats against a group of unspecified individuals.

  9. Moral Injury: The Recruits - The ... - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/projects/moral...

    The two Iraqis may have been innocent civilians. The Marines may have been obeying the strict rules of engagement, which govern when deadly force can be used (normally, in cases where the approaching car is a threat to American life and the driver refuses several warning signals to stop). But the damage was still done.