Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In decision theory, a decision rule is a function which maps an observation to an appropriate action. Decision rules play an important role in the theory of statistics and economics , and are closely related to the concept of a strategy in game theory .
In a finite decision problem, the risk point of an admissible decision rule has either lower x-coordinates or y-coordinates than all other risk points or, more formally, it is the set of rules with risk points of the form (,) such that {(,):,} = (,). Thus the left side of the lower boundary of the risk set is the set of admissible decision rules.
A decision rule that minimizes (,) is called a Bayes rule with respect to (). There may be more than one such Bayes rule. There may be more than one such Bayes rule. If the Bayes risk is infinite for all δ {\displaystyle \delta \,\!} , then no Bayes rule is defined.
The mythological Judgement of Paris required selecting from three incomparable alternatives (the goddesses shown).. Decision theory or the theory of rational choice is a branch of probability, economics, and analytic philosophy that uses the tools of expected utility and probability to model how individuals would behave rationally under uncertainty.
In decision theory, a decision rule is said to dominate another if the performance of the former is sometimes better, and never worse, than that of the latter. Formally, let δ 1 {\displaystyle \delta _{1}} and δ 2 {\displaystyle \delta _{2}} be two decision rules , and let R ( θ , δ ) {\displaystyle R(\theta ,\delta )} be the risk of rule ...
An estimator or decision rule with zero bias is called unbiased. In statistics, "bias" is an objective property of an estimator. Bias is a distinct concept from consistency : consistent estimators converge in probability to the true value of the parameter, but may be biased or unbiased (see bias versus consistency for more).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Randomized_decision_rule&oldid=788564168"
To demonstrate the unintuitive nature of Stein's example, consider the following real-world example. Suppose we are to estimate three unrelated parameters, such as the US wheat yield for 1993, the number of spectators at the Wimbledon tennis tournament in 2001, and the weight of a randomly chosen candy bar from the supermarket.