enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Award Act of 1976 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Attorney's...

    The text of 42 U.S.C. § 1988(b) are as follows: "(b) Attorney’s fees In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title, title IX of Public Law 92–318, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, or section 12361 ...

  3. Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domino's_Pizza,_Inc._v...

    Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald, 546 U.S. 470 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving claims for racial discrimination against the right to make and enforce contracts under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, a key civil rights provision in U.S. law that was originally enacted as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866.

  4. Mixed motive discrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_motive_discrimination

    "Mixed motive" discrimination is a category of discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.. Where the plaintiff has shown intentional discrimination in a mixed motive case, the defendant can still avoid liability for money damages by demonstrating by a preponderance of the evidence that the same decision would have been made even in the absence of the impermissible ...

  5. Meta must face lawsuit claiming it prefers foreign workers ...

    www.aol.com/news/meta-must-face-lawsuit-claiming...

    Unlike Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the federal law banning workplace discrimination, Section 1981 does not cap the damages that plaintiffs can receive if they win lawsuits, and it ...

  6. City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Rancho_Palos_Verde...

    City of Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams, 544 U.S. 113 (2005), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that the Telecommunications Act (TCA) precluded damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 [1] because it provided a comprehensive remedial scheme. Rancho Palos Verdes v. Abrams is a part of the Sea Clammers Doctrine line of cases. [2]

  7. Title 42 of the United States Code - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Title_42_of_the_United...

    Title 42 of the United States Code is the United States Code dealing with public health, social welfare, and civil rights. Parts of Title 42 which formerly related to the US space program have been transferred to Title 51 .

  8. Qualified immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity

    Qualified immunity frequently arises in civil rights cases, [7] particularly in lawsuits arising under 42 USC § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents (1971). [8] Under 42 USC § 1983, a plaintiff can sue for damages when state officials violate their constitutional rights or other federal rights. The text of 42 USC § 1983 reads as ...

  9. National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Childhood_Vaccine...

    The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) of 1986 (42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-1 to 300aa-34) was signed into law by United States President Ronald Reagan as part of a larger health bill on November 14, 1986.