Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
License suspension or revocation traditionally follows conviction for alcohol-impaired or drunk driving. However, under administrative license suspension (ALS) laws, sometimes called administrative license revocation or administrative per se, [1] licenses are confiscated and automatically suspended independent of criminal proceedings whenever a driver either (1) refuses to submit to chemical ...
With nearly 900,000 suspended drivers in Ohio, ... Poverty advocates and civil rights activists are cheering them on. ... The license has been suspended for one or more eligible offenses.
Having a suspended license means you are denied driving privileges for a defined period of time. Typically, to end a license suspension, you must take specific actions to have your license ...
More than 1 million Ohioans had a suspended driver's license as of 2022, according to the Legal Aid Society of Cleveland. Several thousand of those Ohioans would likely fit the criteria to regain ...
The Solomon–Lautenberg amendment is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1990 that urges states to suspend the driver's license of anyone who commits a drug offense. A number of states passed laws in the early 1990s seeking to comply with the amendment, in order to avoid a penalty of reduced federal highway funds.
Arizona v. Evans, 514 U.S. 1 (1995), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court instituted an exclusionary rule exception allowing evidence obtained through a warrantless search to be valid when a police record erroneously indicates the existence of an outstanding warrant due to negligent conduct of a Clerk of Court.
Polk County Attorney Kimberly Graham says a new program that allows people to make income-based payments on fines and get back driver's licenses suspended for nonpayment appears to be having results.
In 2016, Marple was charged with driving with a suspended license, after being pulled over in 2015. In a long rant he delivered directly to the judge presiding over his case, Kristin Spath, Marple argued a number of sovereign citizen claims, stating that he was present "under threat, duress and coercion" as the judge and the court system had no ...