Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Giving money illegally or unethically to influence a person's behavior is a form of bribery. Bribery is the offering , giving, receiving , or soliciting of any item of value to influence the actions of an official, or other person, in charge of a public or legal duty and to incline the individual to act contrary to their duty and the known ...
See forgery: Offences under Part I of the Forgery and Counterfeiting Act 1981; Falsification of pedigree, contrary to section 183(1)(b) of the Law of Property Act 1925; Improper alteration of the registers, contrary to section 124 of the Land Registration Act 2002; Offences under section 8 of the Non-Parochial Registers Act 1840
Contextual factors that individual teachers can affect often make the least difference on cheating behavior. A study found that increasing the distance between students taking an exam has little effect on academic misconduct, and that threatening students before an exam with expulsion if they cheat actually promotes cheating behavior. [92]
Green, Stuart P. Lying, Cheating, and Stealing: A Moral Theory of White Collar Crime. Oxford University Press, 2006. ISBN 978-0-19-922580-4; Review Fraud – Alex Copola Podgor, Ellen S. Criminal Fraud, (1999) Vol, 48, No. 4 American Law Review 1. The Nature, Extent and Economic Impact of Fraud in the UK. February, 2007.
A forgery is essentially concerned with a produced or altered object. Where the prime concern of a forgery is less focused on the object itself – what it is worth or what it "proves" – than on a tacit statement of criticism that is revealed by the reactions the object provokes in others, then the larger process is a hoax.
During a hearing on Tuesday, Dec. 10, ABC and CBS reported that when Mangione tried to speak up in court, his attorney, Tom Dickey, told the 26-year-old not to say a word.
[88] (opposite of appeal to tradition) Appeal to poverty (argumentum ad Lazarum) – supporting a conclusion because the arguer is poor (or refuting because the arguer is wealthy). (Opposite of appeal to wealth.) [89] Appeal to tradition (argumentum ad antiquitatem) – a conclusion supported solely because it has long been held to be true. [90]
In criminology, public-order crime is defined by Siegel (2004) as "crime which involves acts that interfere with the operations of society and the ability of people to function efficiently", i.e., it is behaviour that has been labelled criminal because it is contrary to shared norms, social values, and customs.