enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Katz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katz_v._United_States

    Katz v. United States , 389 U.S. 347 (1967), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court redefined what constitutes a "search" or "seizure" with regard to the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution .

  3. Minimally invasive warrantless search - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimally_invasive_warrant...

    In Katz v.United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967), electronic eavesdropping devices attached to the outside of a phonebooth or a home were deemed to violate the unreasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, because the interior private life of the homeowners was exposed along with information about illegal activity.

  4. Mosaic theory of the Fourth Amendment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_theory_of_the...

    The D.C. Circuit court was the first to apply mosaic theory to a Fourth Amendment issue in United States v. Maynard, a case involving GPS surveillance of a car over a period of twenty-eight days. [1] [17] To answer this question, the court applied the test developed by Justice Harlan in Katz v. United States. [19]

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 277

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Supreme Court of the United States 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W  /  38.89056°N 77.00444°W  / 38.89056; -77.00444 Established March 4, 1789 ; 235 years ago (1789-03-04) Location Washington, D.C. Coordinates 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W  /  38.89056°N 77.00444°W  / 38.89056; -77.00444 Composition method Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation Authorised by ...

  6. Expectation of privacy (United States) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expectation_of_privacy...

    In Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967) Justice Harlan issued a concurring opinion articulating the two-prong test later adopted by the U.S. Supreme Court as the test for determining whether a police or government search is subject to the limitations of the Fourth Amendment:

  7. Third-party doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_doctrine

    In response to Katz v. United States (1967) and Berger v. New York (1967), the United States Congress enacted the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, of which Title III is known as the "Wiretap Act." Title III was Congress' attempt to extend Fourth Amendment-like protections to telephonic and other wired forms of communication.

  8. Talk:Katz v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Katz_v._United_States

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

  9. Central Virginia Community College v. Katz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Virginia_Community...

    Katz, 546 U.S. 356 (2006), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that the Bankruptcy Clause of the Constitution abrogates state sovereign immunity. It is significant as one of only three cases allowing Congress to use an Article I power to authorize individuals to sue states, the others being PennEast Pipeline Co. v. New Jersey and Torres