enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Linksys WRV54G router - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys_WRV54G_router

   1] Linksys WRV54G is a Linux-based router that supports 50 VPN tunnels and 5 simultaneous clients. It supports Wireless-G connectivity and 4-port 10/100 Ethernet hub. Unlike the WRT54G series , the WRV54 uses an Intel IXP425 processor, which supports hardware-based encryption, but is costlier. [ 2 ]

3. Linksys routers - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys_routers

   Linksys manufactures a series of network routers. Many models are shipped with Linux-based firmware and can run third-party firmware. The first model to support third-party firmware was the very popular Linksys WRT54G series. The Linksys WRT160N/WRT310N series is the successor to the WRT54G series of routers from Linksys.

4. Linksys WRT54G series - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys_WRT54G_series

   The Linksys WRT54G Wi-Fi series is a series of Wi-Fi–capable residential gateways marketed by Linksys, a subsidiary of Cisco, from 2003 until acquired by Belkin in 2013. A residential gateway connects a local area network (such as a home network ) to a wide area network (such as the Internet ).

5. AOL Video - Serving the best video content from AOL and ...

   www.aol.com/video/view/the-wrt1900acs-is-linksys...

   The AOL.com video experience serves up the best video content from AOL and around the web, curating informative and entertaining snackable videos.

6. Category:Hardware routers - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hardware_routers

   Linksys routers; Linksys WAG300N router; Linksys WRT54G series; Linksys WRTP54G router; Linksys WRV54G router; M. MeshBox; Multiservice Switch; N. Netgear DG834 (series)

7. Linksys WAG300N router - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys_WAG300N_router

   Linksys WAG300N is a Draft-N wireless gateway (router plus ADSL2+ modem) with two large captive antennae and 4 Ethernet ports. It was the smallest such device tested by MacUser , but the web interface was deemed "infuriating" and transfer rates to a MacBook "untenably slow". [ 1 ]