Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The 52nd Ordnance Group (EOD) is one of three explosive ordnance disposal groups of the United States Army.It is the command and control headquarters for all U.S. Army Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) battalions and companies located east of the Mississippi River in the Continental United States (CONUS).
Both G-8 and G-3/5/7 sit on the Army Requirements Oversight Council (AROC), chaired by the Chief of Staff of the Army (CSA). [1] [2] The Army's Force management model [3]: diagram on p.559 begins with a projection of the Future operating environment, in terms of resources: political, military, economic, social, information, infrastructure ...
129th Support Battalion [2] [3] [4] Division Sustainment Support Battalion (HEAVY) 101st Airborne Fort Campbell, KY Active Duty 142nd Division Sustainment Support Battalion [5] [6] Division Sustainment Support Battalion (HEAVY) 1st Armored Fort Bliss, TX Active Duty 189th Support Battalion [7] [8] Division Sustainment Support Battalion (HEAVY ...
Army Regulation 25-2, para. 4-5(a)(3): Modifying or installing unauthorized software to a system, using it for 'unintended' purposes; Army Regulation 25-2, para. 4-5(a)(4): Circumventing security mechanisms; Army Regulation 25-2, para. 4-6(k): Forbids transferring classified or sensitive information to non-secure systems
Military Police: Enemy Prisoners of War, Retained Personnel, Civilian Internees and Other Detainees is the full title of a United States Army regulation usually referred to as AR 190-8, that lays out how the United States Army should treat captives.
The current version of the rocket and missile designation system was mandated by Joint Regulation 4120.15E Designating and Naming Military Aerospace Vehicles [9] [Note 1] and was implemented [10] [Note 2] via Air Force Instruction (AFI) 16-401, Army Regulation (AR) 70-50, Naval Air Systems Command Instruction (NAVAIRINST) 13100.16 on 3 November ...
In the aftermath of World War II, Congress drafted legislation that attempted to address three (sometimes competing) objectives: create "uniform" rules for officer management between Army and Navy (and later Air Force), promote a "young and vigorous" officer corps, and retain the capacity to rapidly remobilize if necessary. [4]
The mechanism dates from at least the mid-1960s, and was by no later than 1969 [1] part of Army Regulation 601-270. [2] There are cases when the use of large amount of moral waivers is for the purpose of meeting recruitment goals.