enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. ARP4761 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARP4761

    The Functional Safety process is focused on identifying functional failure conditions leading to hazards. Functional Hazard Analyses / Assessments are central to determining hazards. FHA is performed early in aircraft design, first as an Aircraft Functional Hazard Analysis (AFHA) and then as a System Functional Hazard Analysis (SFHA).

  3. AC 25.1309-1 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_25.1309-1

    Revision B was released in August 2024 in coordination with a number of rules changes addressing aircraft system safety. This release is a significant expansion, elaborating on the FAA's Fail-Safe Design Concept and crystalizing and harmonizing FAA system safety terminology, such as the intent of “Extremely Improbable.”

  4. Zonal safety analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zonal_safety_analysis

    Zonal Safety Analysis (ZSA) is one of three analytical methods which, taken together, form a Common Cause Analysis (CCA) in aircraft safety engineering under SAE ARP4761. [1] The other two methods are Particular Risks Analysis (PRA) and Common Mode Analysis (CMA). Aircraft system safety requires the independence of failure conditions for ...

  5. ARP4754 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARP4754

    ARP4754(), Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) Guidelines for Development of Civil Aircraft and Systems, is a published standard from SAE International, dealing with the development processes which support certification of Aircraft systems, addressing "the complete aircraft development cycle, from systems requirements through systems verification."

  6. Fault tree analysis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fault_tree_analysis

    A fault tree diagram. Fault tree analysis (FTA) is a type of failure analysis in which an undesired state of a system is examined. This analysis method is mainly used in safety engineering and reliability engineering to understand how systems can fail, to identify the best ways to reduce risk and to determine (or get a feeling for) event rates of a safety accident or a particular system level ...

  7. DO-178C - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178C

    No Effect - Failure has no impact on safety, aircraft operation, or crew workload. DO-178C alone is not intended to guarantee software safety aspects. Safety attributes in the design and as implemented as functionality must receive additional mandatory system safety tasks to drive and show objective evidence of meeting explicit safety requirements.

  8. DO-178B - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178B

    DO-178B, Software Considerations in Airborne Systems and Equipment Certification is a guideline dealing with the safety of safety-critical software used in certain airborne systems. It was jointly developed by the safety-critical working group RTCA SC-167 of the Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics (RTCA) and WG-12 of the European ...

  9. System safety - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_safety

    A root cause analysis identifies the set of multiple causes that together might create a potential accident. Root cause techniques have been successfully borrowed from other disciplines and adapted to meet the needs of the system safety concept, most notably the tree structure from fault tree analysis, which was originally an engineering technique. [7]