Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Chegg began trading shares publicly on the New York Stock Exchange in November 2013. [15] Its IPO was reported to have raised $187.5 million, with an initial market capitalization of about $1.1 billion. [16] In 2014, Chegg entered a partnership with book distributor Ingram Content Group to distribute all of Chegg's physical textbook rentals ...
Software cracking contributes to the rise of online piracy where pirated software is distributed to end-users [2] through filesharing sites like BitTorrent, One click hosting (OCH), or via Usenet downloads, or by downloading bundles of the original software with cracks or keygens. [4] Some of these tools are called keygen, patch, loader, or no ...
As such, sites linking to sites which acted as proxies to The Pirate Bay were themselves added to the list of banned sites, including piratebayproxy.co.uk, piratebayproxylist.com and ukbay.org. This led to the indirect blocking (or hiding) of sites at the following domains, among others: [22] [23]
Prior to 2010, technology allowed users to record and upload videos of themselves playing games, such as in Let's Play formats, to sites like YouTube. In 2013, Nintendo became a YouTube Partner, registering their content into YouTube's databases as to allow YouTube's ContentID system to automatically flag videos that used their copyrighted content.
The party might not be over for everyone at Party City, as some franchisee locations across the U.S. are expected to remain open. Nearly 900 locations were in operation when the sudden news broke ...
A man is being held without bail for allegedly stabbing three of his family members to death, including an 8-year-old girl and teenage boy, Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman ...
A wall of wintry mix and rain was pushing into parts of the East on Sunday as a strong arctic high pressure system was forecast to help fuel snow and ice for a large part of the interior Northeast ...
During these proceedings, Viacom and the other plaintiffs focused on internal e-mails among YouTube employees who were aware of widespread infringement by the platform's users, including specific instances that the district court had said could be considered knowledge that would disqualify YouTube from safe harbor protection. [20] [21] [22]