enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albemarle_Paper_Co._v._Moody

    Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 US 405 (1975), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that Title VII disparate impact plaintiffs do not need to prove bad faith to be entitled to backpay. It also expanded on the holding from Griggs v. Duke Power that employment tests must be sufficiently job-related.

  3. Disparate impact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_impact

    Griggs v. Duke Power Company, 401 U.S. 424 (1971) — established theory of disparate impact; held Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 authorizes disparate impact lawsuits; Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563 (1974) Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, 422 U.S. 405 (1975) Washington v. Davis, 426 U.S. 229 (1976) Village of Arlington Heights v.

  4. List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 422

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Case name Citation Date decided Intercounty Constr. Corp. v. Walter: 422 U.S. 1: 1975: United States v. Louisiana (1975) 422 U.S. 13: 1975: Rogers v. United States

  5. Disparate treatment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disparate_treatment

    On the other hand, in Russell v. Acme-Evans Co., 51 F.3d 64 (7th Cir. 1995), the court held that the plaintiff's testimony regarding the qualifications of the workers who were given the positions that plaintiff wanted was insufficient to create a factual issue and survive summary judgment given that the employer had stated that they were more ...

  6. City of L.A. Dep't of Water & Power v. Manhart - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_L.A._Dep't_of_Water...

    In Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody, the court held that backpay should only be withheld in special circumstances. [4] Justice Marshall argued that those circumstances were not present here. [ 1 ] Backpay would involve "a small percentage of amounts withheld from respondents' paychecks for pension purposes over a 33-month period" and no argument ...

  7. Albemarle Corporation -- Moody's says Albemarle's stock ...

    www.aol.com/news/albemarle-corporation-moodys...

    Announcement: Moody's says Albemarle's stock issuance is positive to credit profile, reduces debt and bolsters liquidity in the short termGlobal Credit Research - 03 Feb 2021New York, February 03 ...

  8. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griggs_v._Duke_Power_Co.

    Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971), was a court case argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on December 14, 1970. It concerned employment discrimination and the disparate impact theory, and was decided on March 8, 1971. [1]

  9. Julius L. Chambers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julius_L._Chambers

    Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971); and two important Title VII employment discrimination cases Griggs v. Duke Power Co. (1971) and Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody (1975). [4] The firm's efforts were met several times with violence from white supremacists.