Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Academics and other experts are invited to contribute a peer-reviewed review article to the journal, and must create a corresponding Wikipedia version of that review article. Although the content should be similar, the peer-reviewed article and the corresponding Wikipedia article are textually different in order to ensure accessibility of the ...
The simplest way to add this template to an article is to copy and paste {{Review|date=December 2024}} at the top of the article or talk page. Add a new item to the talk page explaining the problem so editors will know what to address, and when to remove this tag.
Editors request a peer review by putting {} onto an article's talk page. The template displays a choice of topics for the review which the user can choose from. Clicking on a topic will create a new page for the review. The new page is preloaded based on the article's topic from templates {{Peer review/preload1}} to {{Peer review/preload10}}
This page documents a template used by Wikipedia:Peer Review. For how editors use peer reviews, see WP:PR/Instructions . For an overview of the technical process, see Wikipedia:Peer review/Tools .
A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of "Homemaking" Peer review of this article about a famous painting
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved. Peer review of this article about a famous painting
Anatomy; Archaeological site; Artist; Artistic tool; Artwork; Cave; City; Clothing type; Cuisine; Custom; Dance; Drug, treatment, or device; Folk tale; Game; Library ...