Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the prosecution's failure to inform the jury that a witness had been promised not to be prosecuted in exchange for his testimony was a failure to fulfill the duty to present all material evidence to the jury, and constituted a violation of due process, requiring a new trial. [1]
Greene, "Thus the term 'Brady violation' is sometimes used to refer to any breach of the broad obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence – that is, to any suppression of so-called 'Brady material' – although strictly speaking, there is never a real 'Brady violation' unless the nondisclosure was so serious that there is a reasonable ...
Brady v. Maryland , 373 U.S. 83 (1963), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States , the prosecution must turn over to a criminal defendant any significant evidence in its possession that suggests the defendant is not guilty ( exculpatory evidence ).
Brady-Giglio rules generally require law enforcement to disclose information about officers that call into question their credibility as witnesses. Kuckelman, who doesn’t appear on screen, can ...
The policy says law enforcement disciplinary records with information covered in Brady and Giglio, another court case dealing with credibility, have “many difficulties” in the “logistics of ...
Per the Brady v. Maryland decision, prosecutors in the United States have a duty to disclose exculpatory evidence even if not requested to do so. While the prosecution is not required to search for exculpatory evidence and must disclose only the evidence in its possession, custody, or control, the prosecution's duty is to disclose all ...
It is incumbent upon the defense to file a motion with the court that it believes that the failure of the prosecution to produce the document is a violation of the Jencks Act. [105] [106] If the interests of justice require such, the trial is properly called a mistrial. [13] [104]
Under the 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision Brady vs. Maryland, prosecutors are required to turn over any evidence favorable to a defendant, including evidence of police misconduct.