enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a...

    A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar.

  3. Credibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Credibility

    Credibility dates back to Aristotle's theory of Rhetoric.Aristotle defines rhetoric as the ability to see what is possibly persuasive in every situation. He divided the means of persuasion into three categories, namely Ethos (the source's credibility), Pathos (the emotional or motivational appeals), and Logos (the logic used to support a claim), which he believed have the capacity to influence ...

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    For example, a paper reviewing existing research, a review article, monograph, or textbook is often better than a primary research paper. When relying on primary sources, extreme caution is advised. Wikipedians should never interpret the content of primary sources for themselves (see Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Neutral point of ...

  5. Wikipedia:Evaluating sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Evaluating_sources

    First, like any restated material, review articles may have errors. In a conflict over what a paper said, the peer-reviewed publication is more authoritative and reliable than a review article's summation of the publication's findings. Second, a review article may summarize later research or findings that shed new light on earlier research.

  6. Source criticism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Source_criticism

    The reliability of a given source is relative to the questions put to it. "The empirical case study showed that most people find it difficult to assess questions of cognitive authority and media credibility in a general sense, for example, by comparing the overall credibility of newspapers and the Internet.

  7. Rankings of academic publishers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rankings_of_academic...

    In the follow-up literature, comparing research units or even the output of publishing companies became the target of research. [17] [20] White et al. wrote, Libcitation counts reflect judgments by librarians on the usefulness of publications for their various audiences of readers.

  8. CRAAP test - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CRAAP_test

    The CRAAP test is a test to check the objective reliability of information sources across academic disciplines. CRAAP is an acronym for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. [ 1 ] Due to a vast number of sources existing online, it can be difficult to tell whether these sources are trustworthy to use as tools for research.

  9. Wikipedia:Reliability of open government data - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliability_of...

    If we use the credibility estimates from multiples research papers, then how do we combine them? One solution would be to assign credibility parameters to each of the research papers and/or researchers, and take weighted medians (medians for robustness). These could be initially set to, e.g. 0.5, and then raised or lowered based on qualitative ...