Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A right in rem or a judgment in rem binds the world as opposed to rights and judgments inter partes which only bind those involved in their creation. Originally, the notion of in rem jurisdiction arose in situations in which property was identified but the owner was unknown. Courts fell into the practice of styling a case not as "John Doe ...
Another method is an execution sale in a rem. This also removes the attachment of the lien. The new shipowner will get the vessel with clear title. This rule could be applied in case of an international judicial sale, such as an action in rem. Destruction of the res results in the extinction of the lien.
U. United States v. 11 1/4 Dozen Packages of Articles Labeled in Part Mrs. Moffat's Shoo-Fly Powders for Drunkenness; United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film
Judicial immunity Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 435 U.S. 519 (1978) Judicial deference to government agencies Frank Lyon Co. v. United States: 435 U.S. 561 (1978) Ownership of realty in sale-leaseback for tax deduction for depreciation purposes. McDaniel v. Paty: 435 U.S. 618 (1978)
Rule A outlines the scope and application of the supplementary rules in respect to certain remedies under admiralty and maritime claims, forfeiture actions in rem, and the procedure in statutory condemnation proceedings analogous to maritime actions. Rule B deals with attachment and garnishment in in personam actions.
Ocean County will end a standoff with the state and resume its sheriff's sales beginning Sept. 3, even as investors continue to cry foul over a new law they say opens the door to fraud, hurts ...
Ocean County has 51 properties listed for sheriff's sales, although 18 have been adjourned to a later date or postponed. It isn't clear if other counties have followed Ocean County's lead and ...
Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U.S. 714 (1878), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that a state court can only exert personal jurisdiction over a party domiciled out-of-state if that party is served with process while physically present within the state.