enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. This is the key difference between Ida and Katrina, according ...

    www.aol.com/news/does-hurricane-ida-compare...

    Sixteen years to the day after Hurricane Katrina slammed New Orleans, Hurricane Ida made landfall as a catastrophic Category 4 hurricane. This is the key difference between Ida and Katrina ...

  3. Death toll tops 40 after Ida's remnants blindside Northeast

    www.aol.com/news/ida-not-done-us-yet-060137891...

    The remnants of Hurricane Ida inundated large swaths of the northeastern U.S. with historic and unanticipated fury Wednesday night, killing at least 14 people in flooding in New York, New Jersey ...

  4. Get breaking news and the latest headlines on business, entertainment, politics, world news, tech, sports, videos and much more from AOL

  5. Hurricane Ida - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hurricane_Ida

    Hurricane Ida was a deadly and extremely destructive tropical cyclone in 2021 that became the second-most damaging and intense hurricane to make landfall in the U.S. state of Louisiana on record, behind Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

  6. Discover the latest breaking news in the U.S. and around the world — politics, weather, entertainment, lifestyle, finance, sports and much more.

  7. Get the latest news, politics, sports, and weather updates on AOL.com.

  8. Effects of Hurricane Ida in the Northeastern United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_Hurricane_Ida...

    CoreLogic estimated that Ida caused an estimated $16 to 24 billion in flooding damage in the Northeastern United States. [8] The National Hurricane Center (NHC) estimated that Ida caused between $18 billion to $22.5 billion in damage in the Northeastern United States, with a median estimate of at least $20 billion in damages. [7]

  9. Minnesota Amendment 2 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Amendment_2

    Minnesota Amendment 2 (also called Voter ID Amendment [1]) was a proposed legislatively referred constitutional amendment that was on the ballot on November 6, 2012. If approved, it would have required a form of photographic identification before being permitted to vote in Minnesota municipal, state, and federal elections.