enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: is gravity still a theory of matter book review

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Gravitation (book) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitation_(book)

    The book is still considered influential in the physics community, with generally positive reviews, but with some criticism of the book's length and presentation style. To quote Ed Ehrlich: [4] 'Gravitation' is such a prominent book on relativity that the initials of its authors MTW can be used by other books on relativity without explanation.

  3. Reality Is Not What It Seems - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_Is_Not_What_It_Seems

    The book's opening chapters trace the history and evolution of quantum gravity. Starting with pre-socratic philosopher Democritus through to the ideas of Sir Isaac Newton and, eventually, Albert Einstein, Rovelli puts forward a theory that quantum gravity brings great unity to the universe. Rovelli then states that space and time, waves and ...

  4. Introduction to general relativity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_general...

    While there are promising candidates for such a theory of quantum gravity, notably string theory and loop quantum gravity, there is at present no consistent and complete theory. It has long been hoped that a theory of quantum gravity would also eliminate another problematic feature of general relativity: the presence of spacetime singularities ...

  5. General relativity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity

    If general relativity were considered to be one of the two pillars of modern physics, then quantum theory, the basis of understanding matter from elementary particles to solid-state physics, would be the other. [184] However, how to reconcile quantum theory with general relativity is still an open question.

  6. History of gravitational theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../History_of_gravitational_theory

    To make this into an equal-sided formula or equation, there needed to be a multiplying factor or constant that would give the correct force of gravity no matter the value of the masses or distance between them – the gravitational constant. Newton would need an accurate measure of this constant to prove his inverse-square law.

  7. A New Study Appears to Stunningly Contradict Newton and ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/study-appears-stunningly...

    Our understanding of the universe may be completely wrong. For premium support please call: 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us

  8. Relativity priority dispute - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relativity_priority_dispute

    Albert Einstein presented the theories of special relativity and general relativity in publications that either contained no formal references to previous literature, or referred only to a small number of his predecessors for fundamental results on which he based his theories, most notably to the work of Henri Poincaré and Hendrik Lorentz for special relativity, and to the work of David ...

  9. Alternatives to general relativity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternatives_to_general...

    A theory of gravity is a "metric theory" if and only if it can be given a mathematical representation in which two conditions hold: Condition 1 : There exists a symmetric metric tensor g μ ν {\displaystyle g_{\mu \nu }\,} of signature (−, +, +, +), which governs proper-length and proper-time measurements in the usual manner of special and ...

  1. Ad

    related to: is gravity still a theory of matter book review