Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Validity is the main extent to which a concept, conclusion, or measurement is well-founded and likely corresponds accurately to the real world. [1] [2] The word "valid" is derived from the Latin validus, meaning strong.
The MTMM matrix uses two or more measures of each trait and two or more methods to start to tease apart the contributions of different factors. The first frame of the animated figure shows how the four measurements in the table are paired in terms of focusing on the "traits" of depression (BDI and HDRS) and anxiety (BAI and CGI-A).
Test validity is the extent to which a test (such as a chemical, physical, or scholastic test) accurately measures what it is supposed to measure.In the fields of psychological testing and educational testing, "validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores entailed by proposed uses of tests". [1]
Ordinary least squares regression of Okun's law.Since the regression line does not miss any of the points by very much, the R 2 of the regression is relatively high.. In statistics, the coefficient of determination, denoted R 2 or r 2 and pronounced "R squared", is the proportion of the variation in the dependent variable that is predictable from the independent variable(s).
Construct validity concerns how well a set of indicators represent or reflect a concept that is not directly measurable. [1] [2] [3] Construct validation is the accumulation of evidence to support the interpretation of what a measure reflects.
In psychometrics, criterion validity, or criterion-related validity, is the extent to which an operationalization of a construct, such as a test, relates to, or predicts, a theoretically related behaviour or outcome — the criterion.
Using the change in R-square is more appropriate than mere raw correlations, because the raw correlations do not reflect the overlap of the newly introduced measure and the existing measures. [ 3 ] For example, the College Board has used multiple regression models to assess the incremental validity of a revised SAT test.
The report similarly examined questions of test bias (finding some bias in favor of Blacks), validity (finding lower validity, average r = .25 to .35, than reported elsewhere, and that this was primarily due to methodological differences).