Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The clergy–penitent privilege, clergy privilege, confessional privilege, priest–penitent privilege, pastor–penitent privilege, clergyman–communicant privilege, or ecclesiastical privilege, is a rule of evidence that forbids judicial inquiry into certain communications (spoken or otherwise) between clergy and members of their ...
Even though a fault divorce is more time-consuming, and could even be more likely to violate the parties' privacy, a fault divorce might need to be considered. [32] For example, when the party is going through a fault divorce trial the husband/wife might be convicted of being an unfit parent, which will require evidence so the spouse can be ...
Section 1 of Indiana Senate Bill 50 stated that Indiana's Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) is not an authorization for a “provider” to refuse to offer or provide services, facilities, use of public accommodations, goods, employment, or housing to an individual on the bases of certain characteristics, including, but not limited to ...
Continue reading → The post Divorce Laws in Indiana appeared first on SmartAsset Blog. If you’re careful, though, a divorce doesn’t have to bring financial ruin. You just have to make sure ...
Generally, the media has not covered filial responsibility laws much, and there has not been the political will to see that they are enforced. [5] As of 2019, twenty-six states plus Puerto Rico have such laws on the books, [6] and a few states require the potential support of grandparents or even siblings. [citation needed]
Neile wishes that both she and her ex had been required to attend the same type of class, so they had the same foundation for co-parenting. “All programs are not created equal, and my ex’s was ...
Jewish law, in effect, does not require proof or even an allegation of moral or other fault by either party. If both parties agree to a divorce and follow the prescribed procedure, then the court would not need to establish responsibility for the marriage break-down. In this sense it is a "no-fault" approach to divorce.
The ease of divorce in Indiana was criticized by citizens, including clergy and women's rights groups. The legislature increased the residency requirement to one year in 1859, however, Indiana retained its reputation as a divorce mill. The legislature further restricted its divorce laws in 1873, ending Indiana's easy divorces. [2]: 65–66