enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Padilla v. Kentucky - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Padilla_v._Kentucky

    Padilla v. Commonwealth of Kentucky , 559 U.S. 356 (2010), is a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that criminal defense attorneys must advise noncitizen clients about the deportation risks of a guilty plea .

  3. 2009 term opinions of the Supreme Court of the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_term_opinions_of_the...

    Did not participate in the decision: Decisions that do not note an argument date were decided without oral argument. Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's opinion are per curiam. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly.

  4. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) Criminal defense attorneys are duty-bound to inform clients of the risk of deportation under three circumstances. First, where the law is unambiguous, attorneys must advise their criminal clients that deportation "will" result from a conviction.

  5. Is Election Day a federal holiday? What to know before ...

    www.aol.com/election-day-federal-holiday-know...

    The 2024 election will be held on Nov. 5, 2024. Election Day is held on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November, according to the Department of Justice. Elections 2024: News, Candidates ...

  6. Here are 4 things we’re watching on Election Day in Kentucky

    www.aol.com/4-things-watching-election-day...

    Secretary of State Michael Adams expects turnout this election will be about 42% of the commonwealth’s estimated 3.5 million registered voters. Over three days of no-excuse early voting, about ...

  7. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The Court's decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, holding that the Sixth Amendment requires defense attorneys to inform criminal defendants of the deportation risks of guilty pleas, does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct review (that is, non-habeas appeals). Marx v. General Revenue Corp. 11-1175: 2013-02-26

  8. California Sen. Alex Padilla speaks on 'The American Dream ...

    www.aol.com/california-sen-alex-padilla-speaks...

    In 2014, Padilla was elected California Secretary of State, and in January of 2021 Padilla was appointed to fill the vacancy created by the election of Vice President Kamala Harris and has served ...

  9. 2009 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_term_United_States...

    Webster v. Cooper: 558 U.S. 1039 (2009) habeas corpus • statute of limitations • GVR orders: Scalia dissented from the Court's decision to vacate a lower court's decision and remand for further consideration in light of the Court's decision in Jimenez v. Quarterman.