enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: malice intent cases in california court system case search by name free
  2. courtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Miazga v Kvello Estate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miazga_v_Kvello_Estate

    The Court also found that while the lack of a subjective belief of reasonable and probable grounds is a relevant factor in determining malice, it does not automatically equate with malice. It may be the result of inexperience, incompetence, negligence, or gross negligence – none of which are the same as malicious intent.

  3. Transferred intent - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transferred_intent

    Generally, any intent to cause any one of these five torts which results in the completion of any of the five tortious acts will be considered an intentional act, even if the actual target of the tort is one other than the intended target of the original tort. See cases of Carnes v. Thompson, 48 S.W.2d 903 (Mo. 1932) and Bunyan v.

  4. Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burnett_v._National...

    Carol Burnett v. National Enquirer, Inc. was a decision by the California Court of Appeal, which ruled that the "actual malice" required under California law for imposition of punitive damages is distinct from the "actual malice" required by New York Times Co. v. Sullivan to be liable for defaming a "public figure", and that the National Enquirer is not a "newspaper" for the purposes of ...

  5. Malicious prosecution - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malicious_prosecution

    Malicious prosecution is a common law intentional tort.Like the tort of abuse of process, its elements include (1) intentionally (and maliciously) instituting and pursuing (or causing to be instituted or pursued) a legal action (civil or criminal) that is (2) brought without probable cause and (3) dismissed in favor of the victim of the malicious prosecution.

  6. Malice (law) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malice_(law)

    Malice, in a legal sense, may be inferred from the evidence and imputed to the defendant, depending on the nature of the case. In many kinds of cases, malice must be found to exist in order to convict. (For example, malice is an element of the crime of arson in many jurisdictions.)

  7. People v. Berry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People_v._Berry

    Berry [1] is a voluntary manslaughter case that is widely taught in American law schools for the appellate court ' s unusual interpretation of heat of passion doctrine. Although the defendant had time to "cool down" between his wife's verbal admission of infidelity and the killing, the California Supreme Court held that the provocation in this ...

  8. Fact-checking claims about California's Proposition 36: What ...

    www.aol.com/fact-checking-claims-supporters...

    CBS News California takes a closer look at the drug component of the high-profile Proposition 36 to fact-check claims about the ballot measure from supporters and opponents.

  9. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grimshaw_v._Ford_Motor_Co.

    Ford contended that the "Exemplary damages" section of California's civil code [25] required an "evil motive," or an intent to injure the person harmed, for punitive damages, and argued absence of malice. The appellate court cited precedent that "malice" as used in California's "Exemplary damages" code included "not only a malicious intention ...

  1. Ad

    related to: malice intent cases in california court system case search by name free