enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Cross-industry standard process for data mining - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-industry_standard...

    A review and critique of data mining process models in 2009 called the CRISP-DM the "de facto standard for developing data mining and knowledge discovery projects." [16] Other reviews of CRISP-DM and data mining process models include Kurgan and Musilek's 2006 review, [8] and Azevedo and Santos' 2008 comparison of CRISP-DM and SEMMA. [9]

  3. EASE Guidelines for Authors and Translators of Scientific ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EASE_Guidelines_for...

    EASE Guidelines summarize the most important editorial recommendations, aiming to make international scientific communication more efficient and to aid in preventing scientific misconduct. They also support the global initiative Healthcare Information For All by 2015 by advising authors to make abstracts of their papers highly informative ...

  4. Contributor Roles Taxonomy - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contributor_Roles_Taxonomy

    Citing inadequacies with current practices in listing authors of papers in medical research journals, Drummond Rennie and co-authors, writing in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 1997, called for: a radical conceptual and systematic change, to reflect the realities of multiple authorship and to buttress accountability.

  5. Science-wide author databases of standardized citation ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Science-wide_author...

    The papers introducing the ranking have been quoted extensively by authors working in Bibliometrics and Scientometrics.For example, reference [3] describing an update to the methodology of this index number receives about 200 citations in Google Scholar [12] from authors publishing in journals such as SAGE's Research on Social Work Practice, [10] Elsevier's Perspectives in Ecology and ...

  6. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preferred_reporting_items...

    The aim of the PRISMA statement is to help authors improve the reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. [3] PRISMA has mainly focused on systematic reviews and meta-analysis of randomized trials, but it can also be used as a basis for reporting reviews of other types of research (e.g., diagnostic studies, observational studies).

  7. Wikipedia : Scientific citation guidelines

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Scientific...

    Five references are provided early on: two textbooks, a specialized monograph on aldol reactions, and two review articles. Most readers would assume that the bulk of the statements in the comparatively short Wikipedia article could be verified by checking any of these references, and so it may only be necessary to provide additional in-line references for controversial statements, for recent ...

  8. Do Kwon pleads not guilty to US fraud charges in $40 billion ...

    www.aol.com/news/former-crypto-executive-kwon...

    NEW YORK (Reuters) -Do Kwon, the South Korean cryptocurrency entrepreneur behind two digital currencies that lost an estimated $40 billion in 2022, pleaded not guilty on Thursday to U.S. criminal ...

  9. Academic authorship - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_authorship

    Between about 1980-2010 the average number of authors in medical papers increased, and perhaps tripled. [18] One survey found that in mathematics journals over the first decade of the 2000s, "the number of papers with 2, 3 and 4+ authors increased by approximately 50%, 100% and 200%, respectively, while single author papers decreased slightly." [8]