Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 (Act 36 of 1963) is an enabling provision to assist the litigants who failed to do an act within the prescribed time period as originally fixed under various enactments. Whether Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963 will be applicable to the Execution Proceedings instituted under the Code of ...
On 29 March 2017, CGST, IGST, UTGST and SGST compensation law passed in Loksabha [5] The Constitution (One Hundred and Twenty-Second Amendment) Bill, 2014 was introduced in the Lok Sabha by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley on 19 December 2014, and passed by the House on 6 May 2015.
₹ 46 crore (US$5.3 million) [69] Odisha. Month 2021-22 2020-21 2019-20 2018-19 Collections M-O-M Change Collections M-O-M Change Collections M-O-M Change Collections
The usual interpretation of the territories power is that it is a plenary power which is not limited by other provisions in the Constitution, notably section 51.The High Court has revisited its interpretations of section 122 over the years leading to what David Mossop, a judge of the ACT Supreme Court, described as a lack of "a coherent body of doctrine" guiding interpretation of the section.
The China Graduate School of Theology (CGST) is a theological seminary in Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong.The President is Bernard Wong, [1] who succeeded Stephen Lee in 2021. CGST is accredited by the Asia Theological Association to offer Doctor of Philosophy, Master of Theology, Master of Christian Studies and Master of Divinity degrees. [2]
Aruna Sen v. Government of Bangladesh (1975) 27 DLR (HCD) 122 is a case of the High Court Division of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh. The case concerns unlawful detention under the Special Powers Act, 1974 (SPA). The judgement set a precedent for invalidating most detentions under the SPA.
[3] The preamble of the Act reads: An Act to provide for the prohibition of transfer of certain lands granted by the government, to persons belonging to the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes in the state, which means any land granted to the landless agricultural labourers belonging to scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, cannot be purchased.
[3] [5] In response, councils resisted the enfranchisement of their tribe's members and lobbied for the act to be repealed, although these campaigns were unsuccessful. [3] [5] Ultimately, only one Indian was enfranchised under the act. [5] [6] The act was updated by the 1869 Gradual Enfranchisement Act of the post-Confederation Dominion of ...