enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Ass'n v. State Farm Mutual ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_Vehicles...

    e. Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 463 U.S. 29 (1983), commonly known in U.S. administrative law as State Farm, is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning regulations requiring passive restraints in cars.

  3. Whren v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whren_v._United_States

    Majority. Scalia, joined by unanimous. Laws applied. U.S. Const. amend. IV. Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996), was a unanimous United States Supreme Court decision [ 1] that "declared that any traffic offense committed by a driver was a legitimate legal basis for a stop." [ 2] In an opinion authored by Antonin Scalia, the court held ...

  4. Brandenburg v. Ohio - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

    Brandenburg v. Ohio, 395 U.S. 444 (1969), is a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court interpreting the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. [1] The Court held that the government cannot punish inflammatory speech unless that speech is "directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action".

  5. Ohio’s highest court says parent’s rights were not ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/ohio-highest-court-says-parent...

    The Supreme Court has set a new precedent in custody law due to a local case in which a mother said she was denied due process. Ohio’s highest court says parent’s rights were not violated in ...

  6. Talk : Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Ass'n v. State Farm ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Motor_Vehicles...

    This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page .

  7. Why State Farm denied the claim - AOL

    www.aol.com/finance/nobody-know-state-farm...

    Yet, “State Farm has uniformly rejected” repair estimates that exceed $55/hour. “They pay the same whether it is a Pinto or a Porsche — they pay the same hourly rate,” Stabinski told ...

  8. Ohio's House Bill 6 bribery case is the scandal that ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/ohios-house-bill-6-bribery-103003525...

    Ohio's House Bill 6 bribery case is the scandal that won't go away. Gannett. Charita M. Goshay, Canton Repository. December 17, 2023 at 5:30 AM. Sam Randazzo, 74, former Public Utilities ...

  9. Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennessee_Valley_Authority...

    Tennessee Valley Authority v. Hiram Hill et al., or TVA v. Hill, 437 U.S. 153 (1978), was a United States Supreme Court case and the Court's first interpretation of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. After the discovery of the snail darter fish in the Little Tennessee River in August 1973, a lawsuit was filed alleging that the Tennessee Valley ...