Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
(compare string 1 string 2) Clojure (string= string 1 string 2) Common Lisp (string-compare string 1 string 2 p< p= p>) Scheme (SRFI 13) (string= string 1 string 2) ISLISP: compare string 1 string 2: OCaml: String.compare (string 1, string 2) Standard ML [5] compare string 1 string 2: Haskell [6] [string]::Compare(string 1, string 2) Windows ...
In C, the functions strcmp and memcmp perform a three-way comparison between strings and memory buffers, respectively. They return a negative number when the first argument is lexicographically smaller than the second, zero when the arguments are equal, and a positive number otherwise.
COBOL uses the STRING statement to concatenate string variables. MATLAB and Octave use the syntax "[x y]" to concatenate x and y. Visual Basic and Visual Basic .NET can also use the "+" sign but at the risk of ambiguity if a string representing a number and a number are together. Microsoft Excel allows both "&" and the function "=CONCATENATE(X,Y)".
Like raw strings, there can be any number of equals signs between the square brackets, provided both the opening and closing tags have a matching number of equals signs; this allows nesting as long as nested block comments/raw strings use a different number of equals signs than their enclosing comment: --[[comment --[=[ nested comment ...
While it was possible to compare disparate types in Python 2 (for example, whether a string was greater-than or less-than an integer), the ordering was undefined; this was considered a historical design quirk and was ultimately removed in Python 3. Chained comparison expressions such as a < b < c have roughly the meaning that they have in ...
Number End Sub Public Property Get Number As Long Number = mlngNumber End Property Public Property Get Description As String Description = mstrDescription End Property [ 12 ] Debug.Assert condition
A naive string matching algorithm compares the given pattern against all positions in the given text. Each comparison takes time proportional to the length of the pattern, and the number of positions is proportional to the length of the text. Therefore, the worst-case time for such a method is proportional to the product of the two lengths.
The closeness of a match is measured in terms of the number of primitive operations necessary to convert the string into an exact match. This number is called the edit distance between the string and the pattern. The usual primitive operations are: [1] insertion: cot → coat; deletion: coat → cot