Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
While the employees of the NLRB may assist individuals in filing charges, the employees of the NLRB cannot file charges on their own. [8] Under the Act, "any person" (except an employee of the Board) may file a charge with the NLRB. [8] Such charges must be filed and served within six months of the events that constitute the basis of the charge ...
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which was established in NLRA 1935 sections 3 to 6 (29 U.S.C. § 153–156), is the primary enforcer of the Act. Employees and unions may act themselves in support of their rights, however because of collective action problems and the costs of litigation, the National Labor Relations Board is designed ...
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is an independent agency of the federal government of the United States that enforces U.S. labor law in relation to collective bargaining and unfair labor practices.
The Court cited as authoritative National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Oil & Gas Co. [36] If Mackay Radio had refused to rehire the workers because of anti-union animus, then that would be an unfair labor practice, the court held. Reviewing briefly the evidence generated by the Board during the hearings, Justice Roberts concluded that anti ...
National Labor Relations Board v Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation, 301 U.S. 1 (1937), was a United States Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act.
In my opinion, the National Labor Relations Board correctly found that respondent, Kentucky River Community Care, Inc., failed to prove that the six registered nurses employed at its facility in Pippa Passes, Kentucky, are "supervisors" within the meaning of the National Labor Relations Act....
By paying taxes on the converted amount at your current — and potentially lower — tax rate, you can secure tax-free withdrawals in retirement when tax rates might be higher.
nlrb v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc. , 395 U.S. 575 (1969) [ 1 ] was a unanimous United States Supreme Court case clarifying the application of the National Labor Relations Act after the Taft-Hartley Amendments, particularly the application of union authorization cards .