Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The SCC's statement that an arm's-length price can fall within an acceptable range of prices has also been seen as significant, and consistent with the 2010 OECD transfer pricing guidelines, as it appears to be contrary to the long-standing policy of the Canada Revenue Agency to express a preference for unweighted yearly averages of comparators ...
Toronto Electric Commissioners v. Snider (Ontario, Canada) [1925] A.C. 396 Nadan v The King [1926] A.C. 482(PC) Removal of Canadian appeal to the JCPC held unconstitutional 1926 – criminal appeals from Canada permitted: Edwards v. Canada (Attorney General) [1930] A.C. 124 Women's right to sit in the Senate
From 1867 to 1949, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council was the highest court of appeal for Canada (and, separately, for Newfoundland, which did not join Canada as a province until 1949). During this period, its decisions on Canadian appeals were binding precedent on all Canadian courts, including the Supreme Court of Canada .
A number of challenges to the ward boundary bylaw were made to the Ontario Municipal Board, as provided under section 124(8) of the City of Toronto Act. None of the challenges to the bylaw, including those that advocated for a 25 ward model were successful. [c 1] [c 2] [c 3]
The common law of business balance, often expressed as "you get what you pay for", is the principle that one cannot pay a little and get a lot.That is, paying a cheap price will not guarantee the buyer will receive a product of high quality value.
Canadian contract law is composed of two parallel systems: a common law framework outside Québec and a civil law framework within Québec. Outside Québec, Canadian contract law is derived from English contract law, though it has developed distinctly since Canadian Confederation in 1867.
Hearing: September 22–23, 2020 Judgment: 25 March 2021; Full case name: IN THE MATTER OF References to the Court of Appeal for Saskatchewan, the Court of Appeal for Ontario and the Court of Appeal of Alberta respecting the constitutionality of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, S.C. 2018, c. 12, s. 186
Grant v Torstar Corp, [2009] 3 S.C.R. 640, 2009 SCC 61, is a 2009 Supreme Court of Canada decision on the defences to the tort of defamation. The Supreme Court ruled that the law of defamation should give way to the rights of a party to speak on matters of public interest, provided the party exercises a certain level of responsibility in verifying the potentially defamatory facts.