Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Mill is one of the few political philosophers ever to serve in government as an elected official. In his three years in Parliament, he was more willing to compromise than the "radical" principles expressed in his writing would lead one to expect. [112] Mill was a major proponent of the diffusion and use of public education to the working class.
In particular, Mill tried to develop a more refined form of utilitarianism that would harmonize better with ordinary morality and highlight the importance in the ethical life of intellectual pleasures, self-development, high ideals of character, and conventional moral rules.
The only moral laws for the relation between a civilized and a barbarous government, are the universal rules of morality between man and man. Similar arguments can today be found in theory on intervention in failed states. Of more widespread relevance, Mill discussed the position between "civilized peoples".
On Liberty is an essay published in 1859 by the English philosopher John Stuart Mill.It applied Mill's ethical system of utilitarianism to society and state. [1] [2] Mill suggested standards for the relationship between authority and liberty.
In this essay, Mill argues against the idea that the morality of an action can be judged by whether it is natural or unnatural. [3] He then lays out the two main conceptions of "nature", the first being "the entire system of things" and the second being "things as they would be, apart from human intervention."
Mill's Moral and Political Philosophy: 3.6 The Harm Principle. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. 2018.
The term morality originates in the Latin word moralis, meaning ' manners ' and ' character '. It was introduced into the English language during the Middle English period through the Old French term moralité. [7] The terms ethics and morality are usually used interchangeably but some philosophers distinguish between the two. According to one ...
Mill argued that Kant's ethics could not explain why certain actions are wrong without appealing to utilitarianism. [84] As basis for morality, Mill believed that his principle of utility has a stronger intuitive grounding than Kant's reliance on reason, and can better explain why certain actions are right or wrong. [85]