enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Leader–member exchange theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leader–member_exchange...

    The leader–member exchange (LMX) theory is a relationship-based approach to leadership that focuses on the two-way relationship between leaders and followers. [1]The latest version (2016) of leader–member exchange theory of leadership development explains the growth of vertical dyadic workplace influence and team performance in terms of selection and self-selection of informal ...

  3. Vertical dyad linkage theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vertical_Dyad_Linkage_Theory

    The theory focuses on types of leader-subordinate relationships [4] which are further classified into subgroups, namely the in-group and the out-group. [5] The in-group consists of members that receive greater responsibilities and encouragement, [5] and are able to express opinions without having any restrictions.

  4. Leadership - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leadership

    LMX theorizes that the type of exchanges between the leader and specific followers can lead to the creation of in-groups and out-groups. In-group members are said to have high-quality exchanges with the leader, while out-group members have low-quality exchanges with the leader. [79]

  5. Talk:Leader–member exchange theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Leader–member...

    Psychological research in the theory of LMX has empirically proven its usefulness in understanding group processes. The natural tendency for groups to develop into subgroups and create a clique of an in-group versus an out-group is supported by researcher (Bass, 1990).

  6. In-group and out-group - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-group_and_out-group

    The terminology was made popular by Henri Tajfel and colleagues beginning in the 1970s during his work in formulating social identity theory. The significance of in-group and out-group categorization was identified using a method called the minimal group paradigm. Tajfel and colleagues found that people can form self-preferencing in-groups ...

  7. Talk:Theory X and Theory Y - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Theory_X_and_theory_Y

    The quality of the relationship between the two can be described by Sahin as a term called leader-member exchange (LMX) theory. What LMX theory basically points out against McGregor theory is that “leaders develop unique relationships with different subordinates and that the quality of these relationships is a determinant of how each ...

  8. In-group favoritism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-group_favoritism

    In-group favoritism, sometimes known as in-groupout-group bias, in-group bias, intergroup bias, or in-group preference, is a pattern of favoring members of one's in-group over out-group members. This can be expressed in evaluation of others, in allocation of resources, and in many other ways.

  9. Minimal group paradigm - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimal_group_paradigm

    [7] [17] Tajfel instead developed social identity theory's motivational explanation. In social identity theory, people are thought to award more points to their own group than to the out-group in the minimal group paradigm because, in those circumstances, in-group favoritism is the only way in which to achieve positive distinctiveness.