enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona

    Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence at their trial.

  3. Adamson v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adamson_v._California

    Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the incorporation of the Fifth Amendment of the Bill of Rights. Its decision is part of a long line of cases that eventually led to the Selective Incorporation Doctrine.

  4. Pennsylvania v. Muniz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_v._Muniz

    Muniz, 496 US 582 (1990), is a U.S. Supreme Court case involving the Self-incrimination Clause of the 5th Amendment and the meaning of “testimonial” under the 5th Amendment. A drunk-driving suspect, Muniz, made several incriminating statements while in police custody, and the Supreme Court held that only one of these statements was ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Lester B. Orfield, A Resume of Decisions of the United States Supreme Court on Federal Criminal Procedure, 20 Neb. L. Rev. 251 (1941). Lester B. Orfield, A Resume of Supreme Court Decisions on Federal Criminal Procedure, 14 Rocky Mntn. L. Rev. 105 (1941).

  6. Salinas v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinas_v._Texas

    Salinas v. Texas, 570 US 178 (2013), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which the court held 5-4 decision, declaring that the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause does not extend to defendants who simply choose to remain silent during questioning, even though no arrest has been made nor the Miranda rights read to a defendant.

  7. Schmerber v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmerber_v._California

    Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), was a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the application of the Fourth Amendment's protection against warrantless searches and the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for searches that intrude into the human body.

  8. What does 'plead the Fifth' mean? Will Donald Trump do it? - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/does-plead-fifth-mean-trumps...

    The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution establishes a number of rights related to legal proceedings, including that no one “shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against ...

  9. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Rehnquist ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Federal court enforcement of extradition of fugitives Rankin v. McPherson: 483 U.S. 378 (1987) free speech rights of federal employees United States v. Stanley: 483 U.S. 669 (1987) soldier's tort claim related to Project MKULTRA barred Nollan v. California Coastal Commission: 483 U.S. 825 (1987) Fifth Amendment takings clause Griffin v. Wisconsin