Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Motor Vehicle Owners' Right to Repair Act, sometimes also referred to as Right to Repair, is a name for several related proposed bills in the United States Congress and several state legislatures which would require automobile manufacturers to provide the same information to independent repair shops as they do for dealer shops.
Right to repair is a legal right for owners of devices and equipment to freely modify and repair products such as automobiles, electronics, and farm equipment. Right to repair may also refer to the social movement of citizens putting pressure on their governments to enact laws protecting a right to repair.
Refusing to honor the warranty may be an unfair business practice. In the United States, breach of warranty lawsuits may be distinct from revocation of contract suits; in the case of the breach of warranty, the buyer's item is repaired or replaced while breach of contract involves returning the item to the seller. [15]
The "last month's rent" is rent that has yet to be earned by the landlord. A rental agreement or lease may include a "rent review" clause which makes provision for the rental amount to be increased, the process for the landlord to provide notice of a rent increase and the options available to the tenant regarding acceptance or rejection of the ...
Get breaking Finance news and the latest business articles from AOL. From stock market news to jobs and real estate, it can all be found here.
A letter of comfort, sometimes called a "letter of intent", is a communication from a party to a contract to the other party that indicates an initial willingness to enter into a contractual obligation absent the elements of a legally enforceable contract. The objective is to create a morally binding but not legally binding assurance.
The Foreign Affairs Committee chairman also slammed other USAID grants — including $2.5 million for electric vehicles in Vietnam, $47,000 for “a trasgender opera in Colombia” and $32,000 for ...
The contractor argued that much of the work had been done before they left the project so there was not a "total failure of contract". The contractor had been paid for more than the value of the work which was complete and the Appeal Court held that there had been "a failure of consideration" in respect of the overpaid amount. [5]