enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Davis v. United States (1994) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1994)

    Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (1994), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court established that the right to counsel can only be legally asserted by an "unambiguous or unequivocal request for counsel." [1] Legal scholars have criticized this case stating that the "bright line" rule established under Edwards v.

  3. Davis v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States

    Davis v. United States, 564 U.S. 229 (good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule) Davis v. United States, 512 U.S. 452 (invocation of the right to counsel under Miranda) Davis v. United States, 495 U.S. 472 (charitable deductions under §170 of the Internal Revenue Code) Davis v. United States (1974), 417 U.S. 333; Davis v. United States ...

  4. Davis v. United States (1973) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1973)

    Davis v. United States, 411 U.S. 233 (1973), was a 1973 United States Supreme Court case concerning criminal procedure and collateral attacks on criminal convictions. The majority opinion, authored by then-Associate Justice William Rehnquist, held that when claims of unconstitutional jury discrimination are brought on postconviction collateral review, they are subject to the timeliness ...

  5. List of American films of 1994 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_American_films_of_1994

    Opening Title Production company Cast and crew Ref. J A N U A R Y: 7 The Air Up There: Hollywood Pictures / Interscope Communications: Paul Michael Glaser (director); Max Apple (screenplay); Kevin Bacon, Charles Gitonga Maina, Yolanda Vasquez, Winston Ntshona, Mabutho 'Kid' Sithole, Sean McCann, Dennis Patrick, Nigel Miguel

  6. Separate but Equal (film) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separate_but_Equal_(film)

    The issue before the United States Supreme Court is whether the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution mandates the individual states to desegregate public schools; that is, whether the nation's "separate but equal" policy heretofore upheld under the law, is unconstitutional.

  7. Davis v. United States (1990) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis_v._United_States_(1990)

    Davis v. United States, 495 U.S. 472 (1990), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court. [1] It concerned claims made by parents of two missionaries of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, that their monetary contributions toward their sons' mission expenses constituted a "charitable contribution" under provisions of Treas. Reg. § 1.170A-1(g) (1989), a position that ...

  8. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!

  9. Talk:Davis v. United States (1994) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Davis_v._United...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate