Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Supreme Court declined to follow the case of Computer Edge Pty. Ltd. v. Apple Computer, Inc. [3] decided by the High Court of Australia, which had virtually identical facts. In that case, the court held that the chips contained a "sequence of electrical impulses" which could not be subject to copyright.
AVS Video Editor: Yes No No Intel / AMD compatible at 2500 MHz or higher 1 GB 1 GB Blender (VSE : Video Sequence Editor) Yes Yes Yes 2 GHz+ with SSE2 support [25] 2 GB [25] 512 MB [25]? Cinelerra: No No Yes x86-64 compatible processor 256 MB 0.25 GB Cinelerra-GG Infinity: No No Yes x86-64 compatible processor, recommended minimum: 2 GHz, 4 cores
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...
VSDC Free Video Editor is a non-linear editing (NLE) application developed by Flash-Integro LLC. [1] It can process custom resolutions, including high-resolution footage, 3D, and VR360-degree videos. The software allows applying post production effects, live color correction, and motion tracking.
McIntosh v. United States , 601 U.S. 330 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a court's failure to enter a preliminary order imposing criminal forfeiture before sentencing does not necessarily bar a judge from ordering forfeiture at sentencing.
Download as PDF; Printable version; ... Full case name: ... v MacIntosh [1998] 3 NZLR 171 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding constructive trusts. [1]
The former world champion, standing in the crowd, interrupted a journalist in an apparent bid to mock Paul
McIntosh, [a] 21 U.S. (8 Wheat.) 543 (1823), also written M‘Intosh, is a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that held that private citizens could not purchase lands from Native Americans. As the facts were recited by Chief Justice John Marshall , the successor in interest to a private purchase from the Piankeshaw attempted to ...