enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Executive privilege - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_privilege

    The Supreme Court stated: "To read the Article II powers of the president as providing an absolute privilege as against a subpoena essential to enforcement of criminal statutes on no more than a generalized claim of the public interest in confidentiality of nonmilitary and nondiplomatic discussions would upset the constitutional balance of 'a ...

  3. Nixon v. General Services Administration - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nixon_v._General_Services...

    The Court determined that Richard Nixon's privacy rights were still protected under the Act, and that his complaints about his lack of privacy were overstated. Beyond the questions of confidentiality, privilege and privacy, the Court found that the Act does not interfere with President Nixon's First Amendment rights of association. Further, the ...

  4. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California, 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.

  5. Department of Justice v. Landano - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_of_Justice_v...

    Department of Justice v. Landano, 508 U.S. 165 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the government is not entitled to a presumption that a source is confidential within the meaning of Exemption 7(D) of the Freedom of Information Act whenever the source provides information to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the course of a criminal investigation.

  6. Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorrell_v._IMS_Health_Inc.

    Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 564 U.S. 552 (2011), [1] is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a Vermont statute that restricted the sale, disclosure, and use of records that revealed the prescribing practices of individual doctors violated the First Amendment.

  7. Priest–penitent privilege - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priest–penitent_privilege

    The clergy–penitent privilege, clergy privilege, confessional privilege, priest–penitent privilege, pastor–penitent privilege, clergyman–communicant privilege, or ecclesiastical privilege, is a rule of evidence that forbids judicial inquiry into certain communications (spoken or otherwise) between clergy and members of their congregation. [1]

  8. Opinion - The supreme crisis of Chief Justice John Roberts - AOL

    www.aol.com/opinion-supreme-crisis-chief-justice...

    Chief Justice John Roberts is facing a scandal after the New York Times published leaked confidential information from the Supreme Court, which could only have come from one of the nine members of ...

  9. Supreme Court of the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supreme_Court_of_the...

    The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) is the highest court in the federal judiciary of the United States. It has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases, and over state court cases that turn on questions of U.S. constitutional or federal law.