Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Placer County prosecutors have decided not to seek the death penalty in a murder case involving a former Major League Baseball player accused of shooting his wife’s parents three years ago at ...
Judicial misconduct occurs when a judge acts in ways that are considered unethical or otherwise violate the judge's obligations of impartial conduct.. Actions that can be classified as judicial misconduct include: conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts (as an extreme example: "falsification of facts" at summary judgment); using the ...
Voluntary searches are permissible without the knowledge to refuse them United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP) 412 U.S. 669 (1973) Standing to sue Miller v. California: 413 U.S. 15 (1973) Freedom of speech, Miller test for obscenity: United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film: 413 U.S. 123 (1973)
Congress violates the separation of powers principle when it orders federal courts to reopen their final judgments. Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998) The Line Item Veto Act is unconstitutional because it allows the President to amend or repeal parts of statutes without the pre-approval of Congress.
Anti-death penalty activists rallied outside the U.S. Supreme Court in 2015 to protest the execution of Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip, which at the time was scheduled for September of that year ...
The chambers of the Circuit Court judge are at upper left. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978), is the leading United States Supreme Court decision on judicial immunity. It involved an Indiana judge who was sued by a young woman who had been sterilized without her knowledge as a minor in accordance with the judge's order. The Supreme Court ...
More facts need to be established, but Bradford County's district attorney said he is considering pursuing a death penalty case against two people charged in the March 8 shooting death of a man in ...
An alleged debtor is sent postal notification of an impending County Court case, and has fourteen days to respond, by paying the money, admitting owing a smaller sum, denying owing it, or going to a court hearing. [5] If there is no response judgement will be granted against the debtor. [citation needed] If the debtor does not make payment in ...