enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Schmerber v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schmerber_v._California

    Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 (1966), was a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case in which the Court clarified the application of the Fourth Amendment's protection against warrantless searches and the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination for searches that intrude into the human body.

  3. McStay family murders - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McStay_family_murders

    The McStay family murders occurred on or near February 4, 2010, after the family disappeared from their home in Fallbrook, California, United States; their bodies were found in the desert near Victorville, California, on November 13, 2013. [1] [2] Their disappearance was widely reported by the national news media. [2]

  4. Enforced disappearance - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enforced_disappearance

    Women of the Association of Families of the Detained-Disappeared demonstrate in front of La Moneda Palace during the Pinochet military regime.. An enforced disappearance (or forced disappearance) is the secret abduction or imprisonment of a person with the support or acquiescence of a state followed by a refusal to acknowledge the person's fate or whereabouts with the intent of placing the ...

  5. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Robinson v. California: A state cannot make a person's status as an addict a crime; only behaviors can be criminal. 1st 1968 Powell v. Texas: Similarly to Robinson v. California, a state may not criminalize the status of alcoholism itself; the state may only prohibit behaviors. 8th

  6. After 'Voluntary' Disappearance, Hannah Kobayashi's Family ...

    www.aol.com/voluntary-disappearance-hannah...

    Skip to main content. Advertisement. Subscriptions

  7. People can't be detained just for trying to avoid police ...

    www.aol.com/news/people-cant-detained-just...

    Police officers cannot detain someone on the street just because that person acts furtively to avoid contact with them, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

  8. Chapman v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chapman_v._California

    California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967), [1] was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that a federal "harmless error" rule must apply, instead of equivalent state rules, for reviewing trials where federally-protected rights had been violated.

  9. Opinion: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling treats ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-massachusetts-supreme...

    The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court majority opinion in Commonwealth v. ... This ruling devastated surviving families of homicide victims who were previously promised that, if convicted ...